Author: Noah Arney

  • Failure and Education

    Today I read a list of “25 of the Most Important Things a Dad Can Teach His Kids“.  I don’t agree with them all, but number one was in my opinion the most important thing you can teach.

    Winning is fun, but it teaches you nothing. Failure is the best teacher in the world. Winning is a trophy, failing is an education.”

    Failing is the best way to learn.  If you’ve always succeeded at everything what happens when you come up against something too big for you?  From this standpoint it’s a very good thing to have older brothers.  They teach you very quickly what it is to lose. Growing up means learning to deal with failure.  There is no one in the world that has never failed.  But if you fail at things early in life you learn how to deal with failure.

    Every day I work with students.  They come from a wide variety of backgrounds, but primarily I work with students who have experience with what our society thinks of as failure.  Maybe they didn’t finish High School, or even start. Maybe they’re coming up on two years clean.  Maybe they’re raising their child by themselves while trying to get an education.  But although we might wish that everyone can come from a history of success (personally, emotionally, educationally) I’ve also found something interesting.  When I talk with my colleagues at other schools they invariably complain about students who aren’t ready for university.  They expect it to be easy.  They can’t see what’s wrong with skipping a couple classes and why they can’t make up for it later.  Their parents come to bail them out of something. They don’t know the difference between equal and fair, or in some cases what they actually are.  I don’t run into a lot of that.  Oh of course there’s a little bit (except for the parents thing, that has happened once in three years), but nowhere to the extent that my colleagues seem to deal with.  I suspect that it comes down to failure.  My students know what failure is, have had to work around it, and are working to succeed despite past failure.  But the students my colleagues complain about don’t have much experience with failure.  They have students who’ve been guided through their lives and educations and expect that it will continue forever, because that’s what life is to them.

    I am not jumping on the “this generation has it so much better” bandwagon, or the “they’re so entitled” bandwagon, because every generation can say that about the previous generation, and they’re always wrong, and right, and kinda wrong, and kinda right.  It’s all a matter of perspective and, too often, of narrowing your focus so much that you ignore what’s happening in the rest of the generation.  But in every generation there’s an advantage to the ability to deal with failure.

    Our society has gotten very good at remembering that success is important for teaching.  I think we need to remember that it’s only one side of the coin.  Without failure we’re just setting people up for tragedy in the future.  That isn’t to say that we should let students fail at everything, or fall hard when they fail.  No, as teachers and educators we need to guide failure just as we guide success.  We need to make sure that students are able to function when things get hard, but also able to take advantage of the straight stretches.

    So far I’ve been talking about failure while young.  And I strongly believe that it’s important.  Without it you don’t learn to deal with adversity.  But that’s not to say that you shouldn’t learn how to work with failure at an older age too.

    I’m a firm believer that everyone should have at least two hobbies.  One hobby that you are good at, that you excel at, and another hobby that you struggle at.  A hobby you struggle with teaches you limits.  That there’s always someone better than you.  It teaches you to persevere, and by doing that to incrementally improve.  A hobby you excel at on the other hand shows you that sometimes you’re the bigger fish, that just as you will always be beaten by someone, you will also always be beating someone else. It can also provide encouragement for the hobby you struggle with.

    If all life is struggle then you will slowly be bogged down and beaten back.  But if all life is easy then you never need to push your boundaries and you stunt your growth.  It’s only by excelling at something and struggling at other things that you grow from both ends – success and failure.

  • Brief Review of For the Win

    For the WinFor the Win by Cory Doctorow

    My rating: 3 of 5 stars

    While not as good as Little Brother I enjoyed this book. Doctorow has somehow managed to put together MMOs with an easy to understand overview of unions and global economics. Along the way he explains the basis of why economies collapse, what inflation is, and gives us an understanding of the reason unions exist.

    If you’re a high school teacher I highly recommend using this book. It’s interesting, current, and will help your students gain a basic understanding of economics.

    View all my reviews

  • Review of The Last Colony by John Scalzi

    The Last Colony (Old Man's War, #3)The Last Colony by John Scalzi

    My rating: 5 of 5 stars

    A brilliant novel. The perfect way to wrap up the trilogy (yes, I know it continues, but it was originally the end of the trilogy). Scalzi has the perfect combination of military sci-fi mixed with bits of humor, political maneuvering, and all set against a backdrop of inter-species relations that impacts the story without ever coming across as being one-dimensional.

    I haven’t enjoyed a sci-fi book this much since the Enders Game/Shadow series’ and before that Starship Troopers. Though Scalzi isn’t Heinlein he’s not that far behind and definitely gives Card a run for his money.

    View all my reviews

  • Of Course It’s Derivative

    I read a lot.  I know this because I keep track of it.  The first year I kept track was from summer 2007 to summer 2008.  I was taking the bus to UBC every day and had a lot of time to read.  I read 54 books that year.  Yes, I averaged over one a week.  In 2011 I started tracking again, this time starting January 1st.  I read 41 books in 2011.  So far in 2012 I’ve read 23 books.  We’re in week 26, so I’m doing pretty good.  I try to read at least 30 books a year.

    Because I read so much I read a lot of bad books.  I read a lot of good books to, but I read a lot of crap.  Sturgeon said that “ninety percent of everything is crap”, and it’s true to a certain extent.  For example I no longer read books published only in e-book format, when three for three were terrible I gave up.  The lesson I took from this is that there’s a purpose to gatekeepers.

    Why is any of this important?  Because I’m noticing a problem with peoples definitions of “bad”.  Too often I read a review of a book that talks about how derivative it is of previous books.  I’ve even made the same argument.  But there’s a difference between derivative and bad.  A derivative book is one that pulls a lot of concepts from previous works.  Because over 75% of my reading tends to be Fantasy I feel that I can accurately say that nearly all Fantasy novels have some derivative elements to them.

    For example:

    Tall elegant elf like creatures: Tolkien
    God stand-in to guide the plot: Lewis
    Super intelligent horse: Lackey
    Long drawn out quest: Tolkien, and too many to count
    Mass group of intertwining characters: Jordan (or GRRM)

    But here’s the issue.  These writers were derivative as well.  Do you like George R. R. Martin?  Well I’m afraid that it comes down to a mixture of War of the Roses with a pretty standard fantasy setting, and some Mervyn Peake.  Try watching a Shakespeare history play, basically the same thing.

    Robert Jordan?  Re-read Eye of the World. There is so little original in it that it’s almost laughable.

    Mercedes Lackey?  cookie cutter fantasy with magical horses added in.

    C.S. Lewis and Tolkien must be original!  Nope.  Lewis owes everything to George MacDonald, which he gladly admitted, and Tolkien has tied together Norse and Germanic fairy tales with Anglo-Saxon romances.

    Ahh… but does taking things from further back in history make one less derivative?  No.  It just means that you have a broader education.  If I lift part of my song from Bach instead of the Beatles am I any less derivative?

    This doesn’t mean any of those authors aren’t good.  I read and re-read all of their books (well except for GRMM, but I’ve never been a War of the Roses fan anyway).  What it means is that being derivative doesn’t matter.  Fantasy literature comes out of the Romances (traditional meaning, not modern one) of the Germans and Anglo-Saxons.  It comes out of the fairy tales and legends of the past.  And it comes out of a desire to reconnect with the Quest.

    When we criticize Fantasy novels as being derivative we need to ask ourselves “Why does it matter?”  Because  everything is derivative.  Instead we need to look at the story by itself.  That’s what’s important.  How well does the author immerse you in their story?  How well constructed is it?  Not where s/he got this idea from or that idea from.  That should be a last refuge for when the story fails.  If the story doesn’t work then you can sit and pick it apart as being derivative.  But not before.

    Look at stories as they are.  Read them for them.  You can recognize where some elements came from, but remember everyone is derivative.

  • Back to WordPress

    Yep, moved the site again.  I decided that Drupal wasn’t what I needed (the security exploit that let someone infect my entire domain wasn’t fun).  It’s taken me nearly a month to learn enough to pull everything out of my database and put it into a WP database, turned out it was a minor problem and I had just been passing over it.

    The biggest thing is that I lost nearly all of my comments.  Woops.  Ahh well.  They were mostly on posts over four years old, so that’s not a terrible loss.

    I’ll be updating things slowly here, but I intend for this to be a functional website sometime in the next few months.

  • Steel and Forest

    driving into a jungle of steel and girder
    cut off from the earth beneath me by rubber and asphalt
    I yearn for peaceful days by the river
    where the water burbled past the stones and gathered in the pools
    of leaping into the liquid ice – and feeling alive

    a building made of cedar and concrete
    made as the best of two worlds -but stuck
    stuck in the man made morass that used to be a forest
    that used to be a stream
    that used to have life

    dogs pass by being lead by their tamers
    thin strips of cloth that Lupa would have ignored
    animals contained in small cages while their masters rule them
    humans contained in small cages while their masters rule them

    and in the west a small patch, a plot of life
    surrounded by the iron and stone
    but to the east – freedom
    city bounded by forest rather than forest bounded by city
    but for how long?
    long enough perhaps.

    escaping to a green world, freedom from steel
    if only for a moment
    if only for a second
    Freedom.

  • Inspiration

    “Inspiration is for amateurs. The rest of us just show up and get to work”

    -Chuck Close

  • The Mind of a Digital Native

    I was reading Lowering Higher Education by James E. Côté and Anton L. Allahar recently and was intrigued by their chapter on Technologies.  In it they discuss the concept of Digital Natives and whether or not they require a different style of teaching or have a different understanding of learning.  Do Digital Natives require a more technologically oriented teaching method in order to be engaged? Côté and Allahar discuss the background of this idea and show how it is based in some misguided philosophy and assumptions, and then focus on results, showing that where universities have increased the amount of technology in their classes there is no proof of a corresponding increase in engagement.

    That being said I wanted to discuss what it feels like being a Digital Native and going through, and working in the education system.

    I actually dislike the term Digital Native, but as it is the one used in this discourse I’ll continue with it.

    (more…)